On Wednesday 11 February 2009 23:12:52 you wrote: > Hi Arno, > > I think Qyoto is a really great initiative and a really strong point to > make Mono shine. > > But I wonder if you have plans (and resources) to: > > - Relaunch a website with information/tutorials/downloads. It doesn't > matter how good Qyoto is if no one can easily find it. We will definitely put up stuff on techbase.kde.org, but I don't know if we'll relaunch a full blown website. Maybe something on sourceforge, we'll see.
> - Publish builds on the different OSs. IMHO what makes Qyoto rock is > being able to create native GUIs for Solaris/Linux/Windows/Mac with a > single codebase and minor tweaks. If we only have Linux, then sticking > to WinForms or GTK# is still better, if only Mac I guess monoobjc is the > right solution, and so on. Yes, we'll do that once we have time to build it on windows and os x. > I think monoobjc is the perfect example: they've a solid website, full > of samples, which gives a very good feeling when you enter it. You > immediately think "hey, this is a solid solution". > > Regards, > > pablo > > Arno Rehn escribió: > > On Linux it's pretty straight forward. Download a recent kde-bindings > > tarball and extract it somewhere. Build it as every other KDE module with > > cmake. Create a build directory, do "cd build-dir; ccmake src-dir". > > Disable the stuff you don't want/don't need, like Soprano or Nepomuk > > bindings. Then just "make; make install" as usual. > > We haven't tried building on Solaris yet. On OS X someone got it working, > > but there seem to be issues with header files not being correctly found. > > You might have to play a bit to get it working there. > > > > On Friday 06 February 2009 20:36:29 pablosantosl...@terra.es wrote: > >> are there tutorials to build on Mac/Linux/Solaris? > >> > >> Daniel Morgan escribió: > >>> Qyoto / Kimono Project > >>> http://ekarchive.elikirk.com/david/qyoto/ > >>> > >>> Here is a different project with a similar goal of creating CLR > >>> bindings for qt - qt4dotnet http://code.google.com/p/qt4dotnet/ > >>> > >>> If you google, you might be able to find ancient C# bindings to qt > >>> called qt# - but it has been abandoned. > >>> > >>> On a different subject, I wonder if someone would dare replace the glib > >>> and other dependencies in mono with qt. Then create clr bindings to > >>> qt. With these bindings, you could re-write mono using the clr bindings > >>> to qt. Now, that would be interesting. > >>> > >>> Please note, I am not saying anything is wrong with glib and its > >>> dependencies, I just think it would be neat to re-write mono using qt > >>> instead of glib. This way, you could write mono in C++ and have its > >>> internals OOP. > >>> > >>> Changing subject again, I think its good that there are many GUIs you > >>> can choose to use on top of mono: qyoto/kimono, asp.net, gtk#, swf, > >>> etc... > >>> > >>> --- On Fri, 2/6/09, pablosantosl...@terra.es <pablosantosl...@terra.es> > > > > wrote: > >>>> From: pablosantosl...@terra.es <pablosantosl...@terra.es> > >>>> Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Qt anyone? > >>>> To: "SE1" <ikr...@gmail.com> > >>>> Cc: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > >>>> Date: Friday, February 6, 2009, 6:51 AM > >>>> Ok, great. The problem is exactly what you mentioned: with > >>>> no website > >>>> and no info... there's no way developers can get > >>>> interested on it. > >>>> > >>>> SE1 escribió: > >>>>> pablosantosl...@terra.es wrote: > >>>>>> Hi there, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> After reading: > >>>> > >>>> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/05/2138228, > >>>> > >>>>>> and after the announce of the LGPL Qt release, I > >>>> > >>>> think it's quite clear > >>>> > >>>>>> there's a lot to gain from a *solid* Qt > >>>> > >>>> binding for Mono. > >>>> > >>>>>> I mean, the Qyoto doesn't look like an alive > >>>> > >>>> project anymore (not at > >>>> > >>>>>> least a couple of weeks ago) and if I remember > >>>> > >>>> correctly it is > >>>> > >>>>>> restricted to Linux (true cross-platform is > >>>> > >>>> needed). > >>>> > >>>>>> And... apps! I'd be eager to port plastic > >>>> > >>>> GUI to Qt/C#, and maybe we > >>>> > >>>>>> could start from the Qyoto stuff, but not sure > >>>> > >>>> about the status. > >>>> > >>>>>> pablo > >>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> Mono-devel-list mailing list > >>>>>> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > >>>> > >>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > >>>> > >>>>> Someone brought the same questions up recently. If you > >>>> > >>>> read the thread at > >>>> > >>>> http://www.nabble.com/Qyoto-project-dead---ts21427284.html > >>>> you'll see that > >>>> > >>>>> although the Qyoto website is down, the project is > >>>> > >>>> still very much alive. It > >>>> > >>>>> also works cross-platform, just lacks the building > >>>> > >>>> support at the moment. > >>>> > >>>>> Ilmar > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Mono-devel-list mailing list > >>>> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > >>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Mono-devel-list mailing list > >> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list -- Arno Rehn a...@arnorehn.de _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list