Hi, I just want to know if my serialiazed objects will come through client MS > dotnet and server MONO without problem.
The first response by Robert said: They are supported. > and You can expect 100% compatibility with custom classes (those you've > designed yourself). So yes, you can expect it to work. Alan Thanks > > > > Jerome Haltom wrote: > > > > These questions are all answered on MSDN in the documentation describing > > how works. Look into MarshalByRefObjects, ObjRef, transparent proxies > > and real proxies. > > > > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 08:36 -0700, Eric45 wrote: > >> > >> Hi > >> > >> Perhaps i was not enough precise in my question. > >> > >> I want to make a DOTnet client on windows running above Microsoft DOTnet > >> framework 2.0. > >> Then i have a DOTnet server on linux running above MONO. > >> > >> So i am asking myself if remoting will be compliant. > >> Lets take an example. > >> > >> If the client pass a serialized object (one of my ISerializable class) > >> lets > >> named it Class1. > >> How the MONO server make the link with its own class Class1 (exactly the > >> same) to reconstruct it ? > >> How it makes the link between Class1 on Windows DOTnet and the Class1 on > >> MONO ? Because the class has same name in same dll name and same > >> namespace ? > >> That i do not understand. > >> > >> For reference, MarshalledByRef, i think all is ok because it is only a > >> pointer on a proxy and an Interface. So i imagine it works. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> > >> > >> Robert Jordan wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Eric45 wrote: > >> >> Is it possible to have a remoting MONO server working on linux being > >> >> contacted by a DONET windows remoting client ? > >> > > >> > Yes. > >> > > >> >> If yes how the compliance is made between objects passed by reference > >> ? > >> > > >> > I don't understand this question. Do you mean MarshalByRefObjects? > >> > They are supported. > >> > > >> >> Same question about objects passed by serialization ? > >> > > >> > You can expect 100% compatibility with custom classes (those you've > >> > designed yourself). > >> > > >> > Basic BCL classes (ArrayList, Hashtable) are also compatible, > >> > but it's safer to not depend on classes that are not under your > >> > control. > >> > > >> > Robert > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Mono-devel-list mailing list > >> > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > >> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mono-devel-list mailing list > > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Remoting-between-dotnet-framework-and-mono-framework-tp22451273p22458037.html > Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >
_______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list