Hi,
The runtime tries to abort all threads and waits for them to terminate, so
if a thread refuses
to die for some reason, the runtime will hang. Its possible that the serial
port code doesn't
check for thread aborts/interruptions.
Zoltan
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Leszek Ciesielski <skol...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Oh! We found something with "mono --trace" that we missed before. It
> seems that we are Thread.Abort() 'ing a thread thats inside
> SerialPort.Read() (and through this and serial.c - in kernel mode) and
> the abort gets ignored. However, on the managed side, everything
> proceeds as though the thread was killed - until only unmanaged code
> remains running - including the JITed rogue thread. I am checking now
> this with a small test case and will send it along once I am able to
> reproduce the problem.
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Leszek Ciesielski <skol...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > That's the
> >
> >> kill -3 PID prints:
> >
> >> "0" tid=0x0xb7d206f0 this=0x0x2fed8 thread handle 0x404 state: waiting
> >> on 0x400 : Event owns ()
> >
> > result, nothing more is printed...
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Zoltan Varga <var...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> My mistake. You should send a SIGQUIT signal.
> >>
> >> Zoltan
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Leszek Ciesielski <skol...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> kill -SIGUSR1 PID prints
> >>>
> >>> User definied signal 1
> >>>
> >>> And Mono terminates. Does this suggest no managed threads were left
> >>> (there are 10 or 11 while the application is running)? gdb native
> >>> stack trace follows:
> >>>
> >>> 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
> >>> (gdb) thread apply all bt
> >>>
> >>> Thread 4 (Thread 0xb7573b90 (LWP 25150)):
> >>> #0 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
> >>> #1 0xb7ee73f6 in nanosleep () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
> >>> #2 0x081a91f8 in collection_thread (unused=0x0) at collection.c:34
> >>> #3 0xb7ee01b5 in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
> >>> #4 0xb7e263be in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6
> >>>
> >>> Thread 3 (Thread 0xb754fb90 (LWP 25151)):
> >>> #0 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
> >>> #1 0xb7ee5ef5 in sem_wait@@GLIBC_2.1 () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
> >>> #2 0x0812eed9 in finalizer_thread (unused=0x0) at gc.c:1058
> >>> #3 0x08153188 in start_wrapper (data=0x8305078) at threads.c:623
> >>> #4 0x081c5d66 in thread_start_routine (args=0x82faaa4) at
> threads.c:286
> >>> #5 0x081e5aa5 in GC_start_routine (arg=0x26f20) at
> pthread_support.c:1382
> >>> #6 0xb7ee01b5 in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
> >>> #7 0xb7e263be in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6
> >>>
> >>> Thread 2 (Thread 0xb565ab90 (LWP 25339)):
> >>> #0 0xb7efe3da in clock_gettime () from /lib/librt.so.1
> >>> #1 0x081d5705 in mono_100ns_ticks () at mono-time.c:107
> >>> #2 0xb568bf66 in ?? ()
> >>> #3 0xb568bf23 in ?? ()
> >>> #4 0xb568af80 in ?? ()
> >>> #5 0xb7916ba0 in ?? ()
> >>> #6 0x08110f14 in mono_runtime_delegate_invoke (delegate=0x1a6b712,
> >>> params=0xb565a2e4, exc=0x0)
> >>> at object.c:2943
> >>> #7 0x0815320f in start_wrapper (data=0x0) at threads.c:629
> >>> #8 0x081c5d66 in thread_start_routine (args=0x82faff4) at
> threads.c:286
> >>> #9 0x081e5aa5 in GC_start_routine (arg=0x2dffe0) at
> >>> pthread_support.c:1382
> >>> #10 0xb7ee01b5 in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
> >>> #11 0xb7e263be in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6
> >>>
> >>> Thread 1 (Thread 0xb7d206f0 (LWP 25117)):
> >>> #0 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
> >>> #1 0xb7ee3c35 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from
> >>> /lib/libpthread.so.0
> >>> #2 0x081af0b1 in _wapi_handle_timedwait_signal_handle (handle=0x400,
> >>> timeout=0x0, alertable=1,
> >>> poll=0) at handles.c:1605
> >>> #3 0x081af1b7 in _wapi_handle_wait_signal (poll=0) at handles.c:1534
> >>> #4 0x081cac2b in WaitForMultipleObjectsEx (numobjects=2,
> >>> handles=0x8c0a900, waitall=1,
> >>> timeout=4294967295, alertable=0) at wait.c:723
> >>> #5 0x081510b1 in wait_for_tids (wait=0x8c0a900, timeout=365) at
> >>> threads.c:2443
> >>> #6 0x0815488c in mono_thread_manage () at threads.c:2733
> >>> #7 0x080b25cd in mono_main (argc=2, argv=0xbfafbdb4) at driver.c:1648
> >>> #8 0x0805af21 in main (argc=Cannot access memory at address 0x80
> >>> ) at main.c:34
> >>> #0 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> skolima
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Zoltan Varga <var...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > You can attach to the hung process with gdb and type
> >>> > 'thread apply all bt' to get a native backtrace, and/or
> >>> > send a SIGUSR1 signal to the process to print a manager backtrace.
> >>> >
> >>> > Zoltan
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Leszek Ciesielski <
> skol...@gmail.com>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Hi,
> >>> >>
> >>> >> we have tried to isolate the problem for almost a month, the best we
> >>> >> managed to get is a hardware configuration for our application that
> >>> >> hangs on every exit - but this is with about 8MB of binaries,
> probably
> >>> >> over 100k SLOC. What I am hoping for now are some gdb guidelines to
> >>> >> pinpoint the problem.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Regards
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Zoltan Varga <var...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> > Hi,
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Could you create some kind of test case to help us debug this
> issue
> >>> >> > ?
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Zoltan
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Leszek Ciesielski
> >>> >> > <skol...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> > wrote:
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Hi,
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> I am experiencing Mono hangup when my application should
> terminate.
> >>> >> >> The application opens multiple serial ports, but the bug has also
> >>> >> >> manifested when network sockets were hanging on reads or writes -
> it
> >>> >> >> seems to be related to a pending I/O operation, asynchronous
> >>> >> >> networking helps somewhat. Anyway, the managed code exits, Mono
> CPU
> >>> >> >> usage jumps to 100%, /proc/PID/status shows 4 threads and the
> >>> >> >> application never exits. kill -3 PID prints:
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> "0" tid=0x0xb7d0f6f0 this=0x0x2fed8 thread handle 0x404 state:
> >>> >> >> waiting
> >>> >> >> on 0x400 : Event owns ()
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> and that's all. What can I do to help debug this?
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> BTW this happens on 1.9 (Debian and Gentoo) and 2.4.2.3 (Debian
> and
> >>> >> >> OpenSuse) [so I'm pretty sure it's not distribution-specific],
> more
> >>> >> >> often if the application uses System.Windows.Forms.
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Regards,
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Leszek 'skolima' Ciesielski
> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> >> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> >>> >> >> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
> >>> >> >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>
> >>
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
