On 20/12/2010 11:11, Tom Spink wrote:
> You could propagate the abstract method type parameter out to the
> class definition:
Unfortunately I can't have a generic abstract class because I need:
Dictionary<Type,A> precompiledExpressionsByType;
and then, in other parts of the library:
X result = precompiledExpressionsByType[typeof(X)]
.evaluateSuchAndSuchExpr<X>(param1, param2, ...);
where evaluateSuchAndSuchExpr() is a method of A (GetXXX in my previous
email).
Anyway, thank you all for confirming this was a bug in my code[*]; I'll
fix it using a different approach.
federico
[*] In fact the code runs fine, even on MS.NET, when compiled with Mono 2.6.
--
Federico Di Gregorio f...@initd.org
Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning "I can't configure Debian".
-- somewhere on IRC
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
