Full AOT produces worse code than with the regular JIT, so don't. On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Dan Shechter <d...@houmus.org> wrote:
> Thanks for the info Alex, > I am personally more interested on x64 and possible full AOT on LLVM on > x64, as I use it for an HPC scenario... > > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen <xtzgzo...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Yes, if you want LLVM support, the way to get it is still to build >> with github.com/mono/llvm/mono (that is, the mono branch, not the >> master branch). >> >> It's certainly not abandoned; we actively maintain it, and it's used >> in Xamarin's MonoTouch product. >> >> Regards, >> Alex >> >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:22 PM, damageboy <d...@houmus.org> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I just wanted to make sure that the latest mono from the master branch >> is >> > STILL supposed to go with the mono/llvm fork on git-hub. >> > I other words... Am I doing it right? >> > I the mono + llvm on x64 still a viable option (I realize it's alpha >> quality >> > at best, I just want to know it's not abandonware at this point of >> life...) >> > >> > -- >> > View this message in context: >> http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/Mono-LLVM-tp4650121.html >> > Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Mono-devel-list mailing list >> > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com >> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > >
_______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list