On 12.03.2013 10:47, Robert Jordan wrote:
In addition, Windows serializes a variable name _busyCount whereas Mono
defines _count.
Also, I note that BindingList serialization on Mono has different and
missing variable names compared to the .NET equivalent. For example,
allow_new is allowNew in .NET. In addition, do those serialized variables
need to be public or should they be declared as private?
They must have the same visibility as in MS.NET.
Usually, when a class does not implement ISerializable, Mono's
implementation must be changed to match MS down to member naming.
It's a tedious work given that we don't look at MS' source code...
Shouldn't it be possible to extract "clean room" serialization
descriptors from the MS implementation without having to look at the source?
Extracting that into some kind of stable text format then would enable
automated comparisons, no?
Best Regards, David
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
