On 02/16/2014 10:45 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (mono) wrote: > Yeah, I thought of that - when I first did this a few months ago, I did as > you suggested, but then, I think, the mono implementation differs from the > .NET implementation - where I think .NET generates key in constructor, but > since key generation is so expensive, mono delays key generation until > something needs it, just *hoping* the RSA object will be disposed unused > (which is probably very rare, I'm guessing). Which is the reason that I do > the export of the key. It's the cheapest way I can see to force creation of > the key.
If this is the case, that sounds like a bug. Behaviour shouldn't deviate across implementations like that AFAIK. _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
