Disclaimer: I know nothing about these classes. That said, I firmly support the plan to bring PRs into the mailing list, and would hate to see such a great plan get no love, so I want to say that from looking at these (very small and easily digested) changes, they at least look clean and good.
>From a fellow user of Mono who is interested in its success and expansion (with no say in any outcomes here), thanks for doing this. On Oct 16, 2014 6:23 PM, "Martin Thwaites" <monofo...@my2cents.co.uk> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just put up my attempt at getting the MachineKey.Protect and > Unprotect methods available in mono. I'd be grateful if someone give it a > quick review to make sure it makes sense. > > https://github.com/mono/mono/pull/1349 > > Couple of notes. There is no compatibility with encrypted items that were > done using Windows. This is a barebones implementation in that it will > work and be at least as secure as MachineKey.Encrypt/Decrypt (as it uses > the same methods under the hood). > > This is my first PR for mono, so please be kind. I've tried my best to > follow the coding guidelines, but I'm happy to make changes. > > Thanks > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > >
_______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list