On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 02:47, Joshua Tauberer wrote: > > > one is a generic XHtml provider that works by looking at a table of > > contents in an XML file, (which I gather from Johannes is standard > > Microsoft "HTML Help" TOC format). > > Since the TOC format is MS HH specific and not really related to XHTML, > maybe the provider should be called mshh instead. Alternatively, use > XSL (he he, I'm obsessed) to transform the TOC file into something very > generic first, and then supply that to the assembler so the XHTML > provider isn't tied to an MS format.
The HH format *is* xhtml, so surely that makes it very related to xhtml? :) Given that the format is pretty general, easy to parse, and presumably well documented, it doesn't seem wise to create another format for the same purpose when a good one already exists... It's possible we'll need two providers - one that parses the HH TOC and reads the docs from that, and another that builds a TOC simply from spidering documents. At the moment though, I think it's best to concentrate on the HH-oriented version that fits well for the mono handbook... Regards, Lee. _______________________________________________ Mono-docs-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list
