Hello John, > > Extra points: the MIT X11 or the BSD license are best in this case, just > > to stay clear of the current FDL debate ;-) > > So what license are the docs under now, according to > http://go-mono.com/documentation.html it is under the GFDL. I agree > that we should use either MIT/X11/BSD license, can we do that now or is > it one of those situations where we have to ask everyone who has > contributed, etc.
We should discuss this with every contributor. At least from now on, we should ask people to contribute under the BSD/X11 license. I have not given a lot of thought about the difference between X11 and BSD in this context, but it would be nice to use the BSD, to give authors proper credit. > Also, it would be a good idea to put a small blurb next to "This > documentation is part of the Mono Project. " stating the license, which > I can do if you want after we decide on the license. I think it is > needed because I could not find this information in the Gnome/Gtk docs > (which also might affect the license we are allowed to use). Good point. Miguel _______________________________________________ Mono-docs-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list
