Hello Rachel! [CCed to Mono Docs List] > I was reading through monodoc sources and noticed a long method that > basically was line after line of: > myLabel = (Gtk.Label) gxml["my_label"]; > I'm sure we've all had to do similar things in programs that use glade > (I know I have, at least), so I figured out a slightly cleaner way to do > this, using attributes. > > Here's how to use it: When declaring a member which needs to be > initialized from the Glade.XML, you can simply add a > GladeWidgetAttribute: > > [GladeWidget("my_label")] > Gtk.Label myLabel;
OH MY GOD. This is absolutely beautiful! This is taking advantage of the spirit that got me so interested in .NET in the first place. It is a *beautiful* use of attributes and Glade#. > This doesn't really save much in terms of code (for example, in > monodoc's case, it would require breaking up member declarations of the > same type, so the sheer number of lines of code would increase), but it > seems conceptually cleaner to me, particularly because it lets you avoid > an explicit cast. Yes. But most importantly, you remove more redundant information, and you avoid explaining why you have to cast the objects. Mono-doc-hackers; Could we get the tutorials updated? Miguel _______________________________________________ Mono-docs-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list