On 02/07/03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Now here is a question that I am wondering about: > What is the a relationship between Portable.Net and Mono?
This has been discussed on the list already, check the archives. pnet is a different project that shares some of the same goals as mono, but with different technical decisions. Sometimes the two projects cooperate, sharing code etc. > Also, do you think that theoretically I should be able to compile > code in Portable.Net (e.g. C-Code compiled by cscc) and run it > under Mono? > Initial test of mine show that mono doesn't' like the libc64.dll. > Disassembling libc64.dll creates the following error > > error in file_loader.c: line 332 :(Method_in_member_ref): should not be reached. I guess this is simple to fix, it probably uses a MEMBERREF_PARENT_TYPEDEF coded index. I'll commit a fix for that. > If it should be running fine, I see whether I can find and fix the bug(s). But I >thought I > check first on whether this is even supposed to work. If the assemblies follow the standard CLI specs, they should work with mono (barring bugs and unimplemented features, of course). A quick way to check is using the PEVerify tool from the ms SDK, if you have access to a windows machine: if you get errors the assemblies probably don't follow the spec (though you need to check for unsafe code usage or other errors). lupus -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] debian/rules [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monkeys do it better _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
