Actually there are keys in the machine.config at the part of the configuration section 
definition that says what the scope for a key is.

Http Modules and Http Handlers can only be defined in a web.config (according to the 
.NET documentation), meaning, per application.

I wanted the URL rewrite configuration will be more than just a find regular 
expression and replacing it with another. 

Perhaps it will require other things as well. That is why I think that we should have 
a hook that a developer can put his own logic in there. In addition to that we can 
implement a standard configurable implementation for that hook that searches for a 
regular expression and return some kind of a formula on it.

Eran

-----Original Message-----
From: Steinar Herland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 12:04 PM
To: Eran Sandler; Daniel Lopez; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SV: [Mono-list] mod_mono and userdir

Web.Config settings are resolved in a interesting way: 
If a folder contains a Web.Config file with the requested parameter, that setting is 
used. If the file or setting is missing, its trying the parent folder, and so on. If 
the setting is not found in any Web.Config files, the setting is loaded from (I think) 
Machine.Config. This means it should be possible to just update Machine.Config or the 
"top-level" Web.Config.

Also, if the url-rewriting-logic should be configurable, where is the most natural 
place to put it?  I would say... Web.Config. :-)

Steinar


-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: Eran Sandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sendt: 13. mars 2003 07:01
Til: Steinar Herland; Daniel Lopez; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: [Mono-list] mod_mono and userdir

An apache module will hide this kind of functionality from the user. An HttpModule 
must be registered in the web.config file, thus forcing every application that needs 
to handle this to add that line.

Putting this code at the Apache module level removes the need to add the configuration 
to the web.config file.
After all, it seems logical that in Windows almost no one will use it and if they do 
it will be in a very different way.

Why make them some extra job of removing lines from the web.config?
After all, it is not imperative to have such functionality in Windows (even on Apache 
on Windows).

Regarding the path parser, it is a good idea to use a regular expression and perhaps 
even allow writing a 3rd party add-on to enable very smart parsing of the URL (if it 
will be needed).

I think that it is important to implement multiple paths per Application Host. This 
kind of behavior will probably be required by users that will be familiar with IIS 6. 

It might also be necessary to allow the host to run on a different user (if this it is 
possible). For enhanced security we will need to run the host on different credentials 
so the Application Host we have very limited access to resources.

Eran


-----Original Message-----
From: Steinar Herland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 9:33 PM
To: Eran Sandler; Daniel Lopez; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SV: [Mono-list] mod_mono and userdir

If it's HttpModule or an Apache module "doesn't matter". The request will have to be 
handled / rewritten on every request anyway.

I believe a HttpModule is preferred because it's a pure C# solution, and because of 
the simplicity:

if(Request.Path.IndexOf("~")>0){  //Use a RegEx here?
        //Do something
        HttpContext.Current.RewritePath("MyNewPath");
}
//Done...

Steinar

-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: Eran Sandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sendt: 12. mars 2003 16:17
Til: Daniel Lopez; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: [Mono-list] mod_mono and userdir

Hi Daniel,
?
You can write an HttpModule that upon initalization hooks to the BeginRequest event 
and it can parse the request URL and perform server redirect or directly write to the 
response.
?
I've done such things for different reasons (not the ones that you want) but you 
should bare in mind that on EVERY request that comes to that application it will pass 
through your module so except a decrease in performance.
?
I think you should try to resolve it at the apache module level. Perhaps by doing what 
I have suggested in my previous post (I'm not sure how to do that since I don't know 
Apache that well).
?
If you can redirect a request at the Apache?module level it seems like the most 
reasonable place to do that.
?
Eran
-----Original Message----- 
From: Daniel Lopez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: ד 12/03/2003 14:55 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] mod_mono and userdir

Yes, I already looked at the HttpApplication events and in the System.Web
namespace and could not find a path resolve event? Should I be looking
somwehre else?
The current place I am thinking on hooking is in BeginRequest

> There is a event that is called during path resolve, that could resolve that
> path into another physical path (just change it). I don't have time to make
> a poc now but take a look in MSDN.
>
> Cheers,
>? Patrik
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Lopez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:35 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Mono-list] mod_mono and userdir
> >
> >
> >
> > I believe part of what I want can be accomplished with
> >
> > HttpContext.RewritePath()
> >
> > Not currently implemented in Mono, I´ll look into implementing it.
> > This can then be called from an HttpModule
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Daniel
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-list maillist? -? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> >
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist? -? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Reply via email to