> Has there been interest in creating a J2EE style architecture for > C#/.NET? We can make it "better" because we can make the beans self > describing using attributes. No need for XML descriptors :D. >
This is what System.EnterpriseServices does. - Lluis. > ^Tum > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mono-list- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, 26 March 2003 4:48 a.m. > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Mono-list] Mono quotes from a Sun evangelist > > > > Hi all, > > > > http://j2eerocks.web.aplus.net/j2eeclass/SunShootout_speakernoted.pdf > > > > See slide #28 in this J2EE vs .NET slide deck from a Java evangelist > from > > SUN. > > > > Quote: "Some people think Mono Project will give some alternative .NET > > implementation. They'd better wake up. Mono will never be compatible > with > > .NET" > > > > You bet? ;-)) > > _______________________________________________ > > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > > > --- > > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.461 / Virus Database: 260 - Release Date: 10/03/2003 > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.461 / Virus Database: 260 - Release Date: 10/03/2003 > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
