On Saturday 07 June 2003 16:03, Thong (Tum) Nguyen wrote: > Members are implicitly initialized to 0 or null so they do have a > meaning even if you don't explicitly initialize them... > > ^Tum I see. :-P
So the semantics of readonly members is "members which are not implicitly initialized, and must be explicitly initialized in the constructor"... right? So the C# semantics is itself error-prone, because implicit initialization is error-prone. Of course we cannot change the semantics! :-) On the other hand, my suggestion as a warning might still be useful, maybe... bye, Maurizio _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
