----- Original Message ----- From: "Miguel de Icaza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Jonathan Pryor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:27 PM Subject: Re: [Mono-list] commented stubs in EventLog class
> Hello, > > > I understand, but this means that I won't be able to distribute a single > > assembly for both Mono and .NET. > > > > It doesn't bother me that these methods are not implemented, as in our > > case (log4net) that just means that the EventLogAppender doesn't work on > > Mono. Which is something we can document in the docs and release notes. > > > > It's a pity that we're not able to distribute a single assembly for both > > Mono and .NET because of this, but again, I understand. > > I understand this is an issue. We could change it to throw an > exception, but my guess is that you would not like that either, right? I would not have problems with that, as log4net will not have exceptions propagated to callers anyway (loggers should never cause exceptions, it will handle these exceptions gracefully). > > What about contributing a simple-minded EventLog implementation? I'll pretty new to mono (I do have you quite some experience in c#), and I don't have much expirience in C, but I'll see what I can come up with ... What direction should we take on unix ? Gert _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
