On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 14:57, Simon Kitching wrote: > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 00:35, Jonathan Pryor wrote: > > > Which leaves (*gasp*) the option of rewriting the code in C++. Or, > > trying to convince your client to use Linux on Intel hardware, instead > > of AIX. > > > > As far as the "rewrite in C++" route goes, I'm not aware of any articles > > or websites that suggest how to go about this. I wouldn't think it > > particularly difficult, however, unless heavy use of System.Reflection > > or the runtime infrastructure is used (e.g. AppDomains, loading > > Assemblies at runtime, use of System.Object.GetType(), etc.). I am not > > aware of any C++ equivalent for the runtime infrastructure. > > It may well be easier to port a C# application to Java than to C++. > While the surface syntax of C# is closer to c++ than java, the > underlying language concepts are very similar to java. In particular, > the fact that java also has garbage-collection will likely save a lot of > grief for you. > > Cheers, > > Simon >
Since there is already some preliminary support for ppc, wouldn't it take less effort to port mono to aix then create a C#->C++ or C#->Java system? Just my $0.02. Bob Smith > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list --- Bob Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- ++++++++++[>+++++++>++++++++++>+++>+<<<<-]>++.>+.+++++++ ..+++.>++.<<+++++++++++++++.>.+++.------.--------.>+.>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
