----- Original Message ----- From: "Gaurav Vaish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Maurizio Colucci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 14:15 Subject: Re: [Mono-list] bug found! :-)
> See section 7.2.6 of C# Language Specs (Numeric Promotions). > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > Numeric promotion consists of automatically performing certain implicit > conversions of the operands of the predefined unary and binary numeric > operators. Numeric promotion is not a distinct mechanism, but rather an > effect of applying overload resolution to the predefined operators. Numeric > promotion specifically does not affect evaluation of user-defined operators, > although user-defined operators can be implemented to exhibit similar > effects. > > As an example of numeric promotion, consider the predefined > implementations of the binary * operator: > > int operator *(int x, int y); > uint operator *(uint x, uint y); > long operator *(long x, long y); > ulong operator *(ulong x, ulong y); > float operator *(float x, float y); > double operator *(double x, double y); > decimal operator *(decimal x, decimal y); > > When overload resolution rules (Section 7.4.2) are applied to this set > of operators, the effect is to select the first of the operators for which > implicit conversions exist from the operand types. For example, for the > operation b * s, where b is a byte and s is a short, overload resolution > selects operator *(int, int) as the best operator. Thus, the effect is that > b and s are converted to int, and the type of the result is int. Likewise, > for the operation i * d, where i is an int and d is a double, overload > resolution selects operator *(double, double) as the best operator. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > > > Cheers, > Gaurav > http://gvaish.virtualave.net > -------------------------------- > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Maurizio Colucci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 14:00 > Subject: Re: [Mono-list] bug found! :-) > > > > On Tuesday 26 August 2003 05:36, Rohit wrote: > > > thats not a bug! > > > cause > > > > > > 4/3 = 1.3333333333333333333333333333333 != integer. > > > > Then why does this remove the error? > > > > int o = i/(int)u > > > > ? > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
