Hello! Am Don, 2003-09-18 um 22.09 schrieb Anthony J. Gatlin: > There are obviously some areas (e.g. Active Directory) > where Microsoft has chosen a proprietary path that Mono can > not fully duplicate. I am curious what the general strategy > is for Mono to work around areas where incompatibilities > can not be overcome? >
Well, IMO everything can be implemented, it's just a matter of finding out the exact protcols, etc, etc. It's an issue of time. But it seems like some parts (ldap for example) can be made 100% compatible without much problems. > Has there been any attempt to fully identify which areas > are going to be problematic? Well, it seems like everything *could* be done. However some namespaces (System.Management comes to my mind) are probably simply too much work for only small benefits. Johannes _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
