Matt, It would be great for Novell to get involved in the development if your management sees fit to do so. I have been working in a library for about 6 weeks now, and as you read in my previous message, I am making good progress. I have very high interest in the library's development, as I do Directory Services and EIM related work full time...we actually run eDirectory and DirXML and are using the products extensively in production.
I guess one of my questions now is regarding ownership. I would like to be involved in the development even if a big player such as Novell jumps in. I know that since my work is still in its infancy and that I am one lone contributor, that Novell's involvement may overshadow mine. If that is the case, I'd like to know as soon as possible so I can avoid spinning my wheels. Otherwise, I'll continue my work on a separate path. Matt, please let me know what kind of timeline Novell is looking at for potentially making a decision to contribute to the process, and if you guys do decide to, please get me some information on how many developers will be involved and how much time Novell plans to dedicate to the project in the near future. Best Regards, Jason Raneses :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Jason Raneses Principal Software Engineer Fidelity National Information Solutions: http://www.fnis.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Ryan Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Mono-list] Mono LDAP Status All, I work for Novell's Developer Services organization representing developer relations between our Linux products and non-Novell engineers. I would like to see what can be done by Novell to be a better participant here than what we have been so far. If you are interested in a C# LDAP library or are currently working on one, I would like to specifically know what your interest or involvement is. My intent would be to try to see if I can figure out how to coordinate this with the efforts of the eDirectory development team so we are more open-source friendly than we currently are. -Matt Ryan Software Engineer Linux/ZEN Developer Champion Worldwide Developer Support Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions http://www.novell.com >>> "Jason Raneses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 9/23/2003 9:55:09 PM >>> Miguel, all... The C# LDAP library aims to provide, at a minimal level, the same amount of functionality found in the Mozilla (Netscape) Java LDAP classes. I am planning to support the synchronous portions in version 1, and the asynchronous in a later release. My initial thoughts were to write everything in native C#, however, because of time constraints on a few of the projects I am working on that require this library, I chose to go the frequently traveled route of wrapping existing unmanaged C libraries, and at the same time, solidifying the API, so, at a later time, I can rewrite each portion in native C#, without breaking any interfaces. My development team and I were not satisfied with Microsoft's implementation of the System.DirectoryServices namespace, and did not see the need to purchase a 3rd party library, thus I began this project on the side about a month ago. It can be used with pretty much any C dll based on the University of Michigan reference code. I'd say that the code is not too far off from being good enough to drop in CVS. I have to work on some of the thread synchronization a bit more, and am still finishing up work on the ldap_modify wrappers. The classes and collections that search and iterate directory data are for the most part already completed. Jason -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miguel de Icaza Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 5:51 PM To: Jason Raneses Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brady Anderson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Mono LDAP Status Hello, > It would be ideal to develop a fully managed provider, but I had an > immediate need to get at least a subset of the API up and working, > and the easiest route to go was to wrap the C libraries. My long > term goal is for the library to not have any unmanaged dependencies > whatsoever, and I plan on removing them over time by implementing the > functionality provided by the C libraries in native C#. > > It would be stellar to have the guys from Novell involved in this if > they are interested. Does anyone have anything concrete on their > time frame for making a decision to join the development? Jason, can you tell us more about your current binding, and whether it is mature enough to get it on CVS? Miguel. _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
