On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 10:57:41AM -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > On the subject of a mono v1.0 - As a developer on both windows and linux
> > tring to make a business audiance understand that mono 1.0 is not
> > compatiable with .net 1.0 would be disastrous - don't do it . Mono has to be
> > feature and version number exact with MS if this is to work. Basically avoid
> > FUD
>
> This is a good point, and one that has worried me for some time.
>
> I think the solution to this particular problem is:
>
> * Release with a name that specifically states whats in it
>
> Mono Core 1.0
>
> * Release a roadmap with the plans for when features will be
> added to the full Mono release.
>
> Maybe we need better names than `Mono Core' and `Mono Full'.
>
I think that the best we can do without SWF is to release:
"Mono Server Edition 1.0"
And be sure all corlib, ASP.NET, WebServiced, etc... are full featured.
Regards,
Pedro
--
Pedro Mart�nez Juli�
\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
)| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ http://yoros.dyndns.org
Socio HispaLinux #311
Usuario Linux #275438 - http://counter.li.org
GnuPG public information: pub 1024D/74F1D3AC
Key fingerprint = 8431 7B47 D2B4 5A46 5F8E 534F 588B E285 74F1 D3AC
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
