>> >> "Exactly how do you want to implement a basically unknown api that doesnt exist yet now?"
>> Does this help for documentation? Sorry, I meant to give the following link instead. The below URL looks to me to be a good start on a Microsoft API for XAML. [1] http://longhorn.msdn.microsoft.com/lhsdk/port_ref_elements.aspx [2] http://longhorn.msdn.microsoft.com/ --Micheal ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Pettibone, Micheal L Sent: Mon 3/15/2004 1:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Mono-list] XAML Support ??? >> "Exactly how do you want to implement a basically unknown api that doesnt exist yet now?" Does this help for documentation? [1] http://longhorn.msdn.microsoft.com/lhsdk/ref/msavalon.windows.media.aspx --Micheal ________________________________ From: Todd Berman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Sent: Mon 3/15/2004 12:26 AM To: Pettibone, Micheal L Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mono-list] XAML Support ??? Exactly how do you want to implement a basically unknown api that doesnt exist yet now? as many have said, XAML is not the issue, XAML is a cute feature, the issue is Avalon. And implementing Avalon at this point without any real, solid API docs is like asking to spend time on something that will completely change before it even hits a real beta. Don't get me wrong, I think implementing Avalon is insanely important, but *now* is really not the time in my opinion. --Todd On Sun, 2004-14-03 at 21:37 -0600, Pettibone, Micheal L wrote: > Seeing that the Mono project is coming along very well - I wanted to address what I > feel to be a very important upcoming feature of the .NET Framework, XAML. For those > of you that do not know, XAML (pronounce as "zamel") is much like Mozilla's XUL with > some distinct differences. > > o XAML tags map directly to .NET classes. > o XAML files can be compiled. > o XAML will be native to Longhorn's IE7 browser. > o XAML has the ability to let someone embed code within it :( > > With the above listed, XAML will greatly blur the line between what people perceive > as an OS application and a web application. > > > Has there being any talk of supporting XAML and if so, will this also be implemented > in Mozilla so that Linux (and even Windows if you were to run the Mozilla browser on > Windows) can reap the benefits of XAML? > > > I would greatly like to help in development and/or help organize development the > implemention of XAML -NOW-. Let's not what until after the fact :) > > > Regards, > > Micheal Pettibone > > -------------------------------- > References: > > [1] http://longhorn.msdn.microsoft.com/lhsdk/core/overviews/about%20xaml.aspx > <http://longhorn.msdn.microsoft.com/lhsdk/core/overviews/about%20xaml.aspx> > > [2] http://www.webstandards.org/buzz/archive/2003_10.html > <http://www.webstandards.org/buzz/archive/2003_10.html> > > [3] > http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/04/01/DevelopingAppsforLonghorn/default.aspx > > <http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/04/01/DevelopingAppsforLonghorn/default.aspx> > > [4] http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/04/01/Avalon/default.aspx > <http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/04/01/Avalon/default.aspx> > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
