--- Shantanu Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sheesh!! > > I haven't seen a greater troll on this list than > this one. > Of course everybody acknowledges the contribution > and position > of Miguel. But I am sorry to notice that the post by > Alex Combas > seems to have nothing to do with the main subject. > Actually it's > just *BS*.
Good, Im glad that everyone noticed that I was not commenting on the main subject. I was simply trying to make the point that flaming people is not a good way to get the information you need. Also I made the point that flaming a respected member of the community (like Miguel) is especially ill advised. I purposely did not comment on the main subject. The point I was making was about manners, not patents. I fail to understand how it can be considered *BS*. Im asuming that you use the word BS to mean that I was either lying, misleading, or otherwise acting in an underhanded way. However the part about calling him "Mr Troll" was a flame, I appologize, mostly that was done for laughs, and the same goes for the part about his "hissy fit". Im will not reply on this subject further. Alex Combas "sabmoc"@irc.gnome.org#mono ps. Greatest, troll, ever. Wow, Im honored. > The issues raised by Mr Lewis are completely > genuine, and had the > Mono FAQ answered them convincingly there wouldn't > be so many > recurring questions in the first place. The post by > Robert Scott > Horning highlights what could go wrong (in respect > of clause 7 of > the GNU GPL). If what Robert explained (that M$ > decides to charge > a nominal royalty of $0.01 on .NET implementation > under RAND) > happens to Mono someday, how could the Mono > community work around > that? And would that not affect Ximian's > distributing Mono at > all? > > > Shantanu > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list