On Thu, 2004-06-05 at 16:46 +0200, Kamil Skalski wrote: > Thursday 06 May 2004 12:52, Evain Jb wrote: > > Hi There, > > > > Running a Suse 9.0, with the beta1 of mono and everything needed installed > > via Red Carpet, I got some troubles will trying to install MonoDevelop. > > > > After having exported the PKG_CONFIG_PATH to /usr/lib/pkgconfig and on > > ./configure --prefix=/usr I got : > > > > Package mono was not found[...] > > monodoc >= 0.14 not met[...] > > > > Effectively I have no any mono.pc, but I have a monodoc.pc with a 0.15 > > version. > > > > Any idea of what to do to get MonoDevelop running? > > Acctually IT is a bug, which Michal mentioned before - the message is > misleading, configure script is looking here for mono.pc but complain about > monodoc. You must install mono-devel (or mono-runtime-devel) package. > > Kamil
Again, it is not a bug, if you look at the whole error you will see it clearly states what is missing: checking for mono >= 0.90 gtk-sharp >= 0.91 glade-sharp >= 0.91 gconf-sharp >= 0.91 gnome-sharp >= 0.91 gtkhtml-sharp >= 0.91 gtksourceview-1.0 >= 0.7 gtksourceview-sharp >= 0.2 gecko-sharp >= 0.2 gnome-vfs-2.0 >= 2.0 monodoc >= 0.14... Package mono was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `mono.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'mono' found configure: error: Library requirements (mono >= 0.90 gtk-sharp >= 0.91 glade-sharp >= 0.91 gconf-sharp >= 0.91 gnome-sharp >= 0.91 gtkhtml-sharp >= 0.91 gtksourceview-1.0 >= 0.7 gtksourceview-sharp >= 0.2 gecko-sharp >= 0.2 gnome-vfs-2.0 >= 2.0 monodoc >= 0.14) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. I dont know how much clearer it can get. --Todd _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
