Answer below.
> so I wonder if it would happen in Mono too. The bug is simple, supose we
> have the following in an aspx:
> <script runat="server">
> void ProcessClick( object sender, EventArgs args )
> {
> string sql = @"<script language='javascript'>";
> sql += @"alert('";
> sql += nome.Value;
> sql += "');";
> sql += @"</script>"; // Here is the PROBLEM!
> this.RegisterClientScriptBlock( "JJ", sql );
> }
> </script>
> The parser will only "copy" to the class definition the code from <script
> runat=server> to <script>. The problem is that he thinks that the
> "</script>" literal is the tag end... So in the class definition we will
> have only:
>
> void ProcessClick( object sender, EventArgs args )
> {
> string sql = @"<script language='javascript'>";
> sql += @"alert('";
> sql += nome.Value;
> sql += "');";
> sql += @"
>
> Witch produces a compiler error. Would this happen in Mono? If not, should
> it happen?
I can't answer the "will it happen in Mono question", but a solution to the
problem is to just divide your </script> tag up:
sql += @"</scr" + "ipt>"; // Here is the SOLUTION!
That will work in any implementation that has the bug.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
