Joe, You are not alone. Even on stock builds of Linux there are many conflicts and problems. If you load anything outside of the base product. Your suggestion of putting the working dll's in a zip or installer would work the same as my suggestion to move all the libraries in one directory on Linux and set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the appropriate place to pick everything up. This would allow users to work with little or no effort. Now I'm sure someone will flame me for this but no one including the originator of the project has explained to me why a 1.0 product does not load with libraries and environments of supported distributions (i.e. Suse , RedHat etc.) without major hassles. It seems there is a lot of work to do on getting shrink wrapped versions Of major distributions ( Windows XP is one ) to work with the full mono.
Message: 1 Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 12:30:39 +0200 Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Mono windows From: Joe Ante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: MONO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> HI, After trying to build mono on windows for 2 days using the help of a unix guy, it still doesn=B9t work. I tried everything from the windows build scripts to the www.nullenvoid.com/wiki intro how to manually compile mono. To just trying to figure out the error msgs myself. I am getting problems like GCC hanging in monoburg.c, but mostly just pkgconfig not finding libraries. I am desperate now. Does anyone have a built mono install which includes the dll's and librarie= s needed for embedding mono and wants to send it over? Or what if someone smart would just put the dll's into the windows installer, wouldn=B9t that be like real cute. Joachim Ante --__--__-- _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
