On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 11:32 -0400, Loren Bandiera wrote: > > This seems wrong to me, since getpwent_r isn't a syscall > > (see /usr/include/linux/syscalls.h). But then, neither are some of the > > other things already in Mono.Posix.Syscall, and "syscall" isn't even a > > POSIX concept anyway. Ugh. Bad namespace. No biscuit. > > > > Why is the "Syscall" namespace there anyway? Couldn't everything just be > > in "Mono.Posix"? > > >
Syscall is the class, Mono.Posix is the namespace. > I don't know the history behind it, but if there is an agreement to change > Syscall, I'd be willing to change my code to be in Mono.Posix. I was just > trying to conform to the existing code. It might make sense to move the stuff to a Posix class inside the Mono namespace, but that will break all existing code that has 'using Mono.Posix' i think. --Todd _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
