Hello, > > I think I would like to move these classes into a different class, > > not Syscall, as these are not syscalls. > > Is there really a difference? We're hardly going for a complete library > here.
Well, but it is only for lack of time, not a design requirement. For instance, I want to have Streams layered on top of native file descriptors available there. Maybe a PosixStream that can expose a few methods like: blocking/non-blocking mode and expose methods to cope with that. We are hardly done. > It might be more interesting to start over with a library of wrapped > Linux library functions in C# style, with ThisTypeOfCase and exceptions > thrown if the native call returned an error code. Something > autogenerated... Well, the Syscall namespace kept the libc names, so am fine with that, but helper routines probably should go in something with helper classes and cuter names (like the Pw stuff) _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
