> I cannot understand why your patch could be infrastructure for /doc > switch. At least for XML documentation my patch will never use your > code block, since it has many more required checks. Or should I > use your codebase? Is it better choice?
Looks like I made you upset... and I hate my behaviour. Apologies if this is the case. I never intended to. Ok.. let's look at how with this "string DocComment" we both can work together indepedently. Right now, you have raw-string. In the previous patch, MakeComment (with error-checking etc and generating XMLElement) was invoked right when the xml as consumed. I would just request to delay this checking and invoke it from driver.cs (if "/doc" switch is provided). As such, I will need to update only driver.cs leaving all code exactly same (in my code-base against mcs) when I deal with document generation. Hope I am clear this time on how both of our code-pieces can live in harmony. -- Cheers, Gaurav Vaish http://csdoc.sf.net ---------------------- _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
