> > So why consider changing the syntax? The entries are completely unique to > > Linux requiring a new set of commands for a Win32 port. The outcome of using > > these commands is to control unique processes of mod-mono-server regardless > > of the host platform. This is our way of controlling groups of > > MonoApplications/mod-mono-server processes, what I'll refer to as > > "application pools". A common syntax that supports application pools across > > multiple platforms seems logical/ideal. > > I still like more the setup I said above. Have you tried running apache > using the MPM worker thread model? You'll see it failing miserably to > spawn mod-mono-server because of how apache manages processes.
Yes, this is an issue when spawning CGIs as well. Apache 2 includes a module mod_cgid that deals with that by spawning a external process which in turn spawns others in demand. In that case it is better to run XSP on your own, as you mentioned. un saludo Daniel _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list