On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 13:11 -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote: > Hello, > > > > We are developers having trouble to get our runtime working on a major > > > distro. > > > > The only problem with monodevelop and the 1.1.2 branch is that > > Mono.Posix breaks it due to the developers changing Mono.Posix and > > monodevelop only supporting the older version (and by that, I mean > > 1.0.4). > > We have reverted this decision. If there are still problems, we would > like to hear about them, so we can fix the regression. > > Sorry about this poor decision making; We assumed few or no users of > Mono.Posix when we did the change, and we were *very* wrong. >
Actually, MonoDevelop from SVN works perfectly fine with 1.1.2. There are some (being resolved) issues with MonoDevelop and Mono 1.1.2.99 (running from SVN HEAD) No released version of MonoDevelop supports the 1.1.x series, as that series was *not* in existence when MonoDevelop 0.5.1 was released originally (Although by the time the packages were made, it did, when the tarball was pushed, it did not). So, to recap: MonoDevelop 0.5.1 works perfectly on Mono 1.0.x (stable mono) MonoDevelop SVN works perfectly on Mono 1.0.x (stable) and Mono 1.1.x (unstable) MonoDevelop currently will not build against Mono from SVN trunk, however I except that situation to be rectified within the next 24 hours or so. Also note that these supposed Mono.Posix 1.1.2 changes happened after 1.1.2, so it is highly unlikely that 1.1.2 has any issues with that API. --Todd _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
