On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 19:31 +0200, Lennie De Villiers wrote: > Iâm a newbie to Mono / Mono C#, Iâve a true-C# application (true-C# > being C# for Microsoftâs .NET framework) application containing out of > thousands worth of lines of code that I must convert to running on > Linux on a clientâs request.
As Lennie De Villiers said, .NET isn't Java. Everything isn't named "C#"; different parts have different names. Mono's C# compiler is feature complete for version 1.1 of the language spec, and support for C# 2.0 is being worked on (generics, anonymous delegates, iterators, partial types, oh my!). Then there's the Base Class Library/Framework Class Library. This is what your actual question concerns. > Since Mono-C# isnât 100% completed with equality with .NET framework, > does anyone know where I can find a detail paper that compare Mono C# > with True C# that list which classes have been implemented and which > is outstanding? See: http://www.mono-project.com/contributing/resources.html. This page allows you to compare the class libraries of the various Mono versions against the various .NET versions. However, the Mono-1.04 vs. .NET 1.1 comparison seems bad, just to warn you. The general summary is that the majority of "core" classes are present (System, System.Xml, System.Diagnostics, System.Reflection, System.Remoting), much-clamored-for classes are being worked on (System.Windows.Forms), and some namespaces are very incomplete (System.EnterpriseServices, System.DirectoryServices). - Jon _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
