[Mono-list] Re: Mono-list digest, Vol 1 #2293 - 14 msgs

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:24:15 -0800

hi,
is this link  http://www.go-mono.com/class-status-System.Data.html still accurate? if not, where cand i find the correct progress(status) of  ADO.NET?

Regards!

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
Send Mono-list mailing list submissions to
	[email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
	[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Mono-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Web Services and native shared objects:
       System.DllNotFoundException (Jonathan Pryor)
   2. RE: Bitwise operation weirdness (Mike Welham)
   3. Re: monoLaunchW (Vincent Arnoux)
   4. Paradox table access? (Morten Schmidt)
   5. Re: Bitwise operation weirdness (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Miquel_Ram=EDrez?=)
   6. Re: monoLaunchW (Francisco T. Martinez)
   7. Re: Basic Glade# question (Jonas Geiregat)
   8. Re: monoLaunchW (Vincent Arnoux)
   9. Re: ASP.NET on Linux: apache, mono, xsp, mod_mono (Jonas Geiregat)
  10. Re: ASP.NET on Linux: apache, mono, xsp, mod_mono (Jonas Geiregat)
  11. CVS Repository for Npgsql (Howard Cole)
  12. Re: CVS Repository for Npgsql (Francisco Figueiredo Jr.)
  13. Re: Basic Glade# question (Ian Parish)

--__--__--

Message: 1
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Web Services and native shared objects:
	System.DllNotFoundException
From: Jonathan Pryor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Miquel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ram=EDrez?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 06:51:26 -0500

On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 22:06 +0100, Miquel Ramírez wrote:
  
PS: I solved the logging issue (to some extent) by relying on log4net
[http://logging.apache.org/log4net]. Better than having
Console.WriteLines all over the place ...
PS2: Also tried the <trace> feature in the web service 'descriptor'
but it just traced the messages passed forth and back the server :(
    

A built-in alternative to log4net is System.Diagnostics.Trace.

See:

http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/mono-list/2004-January/017482.html
http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/mono-list/2002-December/010504.html
http://www.go-mono.com/docs/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.go-mono.com/docs/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 - Jon



--__--__--

Message: 2
Subject: RE: [Mono-list] Bitwise operation weirdness
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:30:22 +0200
From: "Mike Welham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>

Hi Miguel,

  
bitwise.cs(11) error CS0029: Cannot convert implicitly from `int' to=20
`short'
Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 0 warnings
    

  
If I do not misunderstand the compiler message, it seems that for some =
    

  
reason the result of or-ing together the hiword and the loword=20
variables results in an 'int' (32-bit integer number, I suppose).
    

The compiler is implicitly converting the two r-values to ints prior to =
doing to doing the 'or', and then complaining about trying to implicitly =
convert the resultant int to a short.

There is no predefined C# 'or' for shorts, and the best match is the =
'or' for ints. See the C# spec quotes below.

  
Why is that? It is easily fixed by explicitly casting the result of=20
the bitwise or operation down to a short, but I can't help feeling=20
that this feels weird: is it a C# specification feature?
    

The C# spec says:

<spec section 14.10>

For an operation of the form x op y, where op is one of the logical =
operators, overload resolution (=A714.2.4) is applied to select a =
specific operator implementation. The operands are converted to the =
parameter types of the selected operator, and the type of the result is =
the return type of the operator.

</spec>

And=20

<spec section 14.10.1>

The predefined integer logical operators are:

int operator &(int x, int y);
uint operator &(uint x, uint y);
long operator &(long x, long y);
ulong operator &(ulong x, ulong y);
int operator |(int x, int y);
uint operator |(uint x, uint y);
long operator |(long x, long y);
ulong operator |(ulong x, ulong y);
int operator ^(int x, int y);
uint operator ^(uint x, uint y);
long operator ^(long x, long y);
ulong operator ^(ulong x, ulong y);

</spec>

Best Regards

Mike

--__--__--

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:41:33 +0100
From: Vincent Arnoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] monoLaunchW

Paolo Molaro a =E9crit :

  
On 01/24/05 Vincent Arnoux wrote:
=20

    
I am looking for launching a Gtk#/Mono application on Windows without=20
displaying the "not very sexy" DOS window.
  =20

      
Compile the app with the -target:winexe mcs option.
I didn't test it, but it's supposed to work.

lupus

=20

    
I used the w32 installer and it didn't work, believe me. I don't know
where to find sources to recompile it. When I try to run monolaunchW
myapp.exe, I get a "Cannot find mscoree.dll" error message. If I
download this dll from Internet and retry, I get something like ".NET is
not correctly installed" message.

Vincent


--__--__--

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:14:05 +0100
From: "Morten Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>,
	<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Mono-list] Paradox table access?

--=__Part94B42E0D.0__=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I'm not sure this is the place to ask, but here goes nothing: 
 
Anyone jnow anything abaout accessing Paradox Tables in an easy fashion,
ie. directly/ODBC/ADO or what-ever? 
 
thanks... Just point me in the direction of a few pages on the
subject... 
 
/morten

Reply via email to