I have all my data access code in a separate class library project and I have to compile it on the linux machine to get it to work for the same reason.
Certainly not the worst idea. I may have to end up doing that myself. I guess I'd just prefer to keep everything in my VS environment for ease of development.
On the windows machine I have the ByteFx source code compiled with Rebuild, but it references sharpziplib which is an already compiled dll that is probably not done with Rebuild.
Trying this path at the moment. I found the ByteFX source (for 0.71, I couldn't find the source for anything later) and opened it in VS to compile. Of course, it needs SharpZipLib. So I downloaded the source for that, but it didn't seem like a "VS" project. I was able to open the individual code files, but no main project. My guess it that it was written/compiled using *their* IDE (available from the same wite where I found the source).
Two things I can try when I get the time (hopefully tonight):
1) Open the SharpZipLib source in their IDE and see if it distinguishes between "Build" and "Rebuild."
2) Scour the ByteFX code for references to SharpZipLib, add .cs files as necessary so that it's all a single project (and cross my fingers, I guess).
I'll let you know how either one turns out.
Regards, David P. Donahue [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
