Carl Olsen wrote:

I agree. I'm running SuSE 9.2 Pro and I saw the 1.1.4 packages for 9.2 and
a note to download XSP, mod_mono, monodoc, and monodevelop from the 1.0.6
version. The 1.0.6 version said it was for SuSE 9.1 Pro and I stopped
because I don't know if packages for 9.1 are compatible with 9.2. I'm sure
I'm not the only novice that is going to hesitate when they see that.


I'm not a SuSE user (Used 9.1 when SuSE still felt free... now it just feels like they want my money, which isn't abnormal or queer, but still), but I would assume that a 9.1 package will work fine in 9.2. Unless there are major differences in the structure (i.e. installing binaries to /usr/local/bin rather than /usr/bin or something) a package is theoretically compatible with any Linux system of the same architecture. SuSE 9.1 and 9.2 are most likely nearly identical in system structure, except for probably having difference versions of some core system components (Like glibc) that could cause compatibility issues.

   SigmaX

--
Registered Linux Freak #: 366,862
http://counter.li.org

I'm a SDA... 'a who?" you say? See below:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/sda.htm<<
Why?:
http://www.matthewmcgee.org/prophesy.html<<

_______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Reply via email to