On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 09:37 +0300, Kirill wrote: I have no desire to address your ranting about a website that may or may not be the most clear, but absolutely is not as difficult as you say to navigate (As a point of reference, one of our developers at work who has never used linux was able to build mono 1.1.6 without any help from anyone, and asked a grand total of 2 questions in order to get MD 0.6 running)
> Yes, that's why I took the hassle to install the new MD version, in > spite of the previous bad installation experience (the last time I ended > up replacing some of the Mono packages with a third-party build, because > of unsutisfied dependencies). But my team is currently planning a new > project with .NET or Java, and I was thinking to do it with Mono, but > this turns out to still be a non-option, because there's no good IDE > available, neither for Windows (#Develop only works with MS runtime), > nor for Linux. So I say - the current MonoDevelop's features are good > enough, just make it stable! Thanks for the bug reports. In case you were just tuning in, you have filed a grand total of 0 bug reports, so as far as we know, MD works fine for you. But thanks for helping us so much. --Todd _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
