> On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 09:41 +0100, Chris Aitken wrote: > > I imported an ASP.NET 1.1 web form into VWDE, and it would > not build. > > I hadn't included 'partial' in the class definition. I > understand the > > partial allows one to spread a class definition over a number of > > source files - but my class was in a single source file! Obviously > > partial is now in the C# 3rd edition, but is it necessary > to declare a > > class as partial when it exists in a single file - or is > this an MS beta issue? > > Nope. It will build another source with the design-time set > things besides your source. And will compile both. Previously > inheritance was used now both sources are partial definitions > of the same class. > > > One thing I did like was the new class derivation model. > The aspx page > > can define controls (labels, button etc), without the need > to declare > > the protected members within the source file. > > That's why the second "partial" source exists...
Cunning....I hadn't thought of the aspx page as the second part of the 'partial'. Thanks -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
