As I understand it implicitly typed local variables are required for things
like anonymous types and LINQ to actually work. You cannot say which type an
anonymous type has. Check out this video, it clarified a lot of things for
me:
http://channel9.msdn.com/showpost.aspx?postid=114680
Bernhard
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marcus"
Most of the features look like solutions in search of a problem,
especially
implicitly typed local variables and object and collection initializers. I
have used languages that do have these features, and I really do not miss
them in C#.
Some of the other features like lambda expressions and anonymous types
might
be useful in some cases, but I'm afraid that people will they will be
over-used by programmers who just cannot resist using these new
"features."
If you give someone a hammer, he will find something that needs hammering.
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 4:48 pm, Paul wrote:
Hi
There are some interesting new features being proposed for C# 3.0....If
your interested then look at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vcsharp/future/default.aspx
(in particular the hands-on-lab .doc file).
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
