If you *really* hope "it ends here", stop asking everything.
That is what we call "unfair".
My interpretation is nothing arrogant. In your logic that "if
everyone does not agree it is not the community's will", then
"implementing SWF designer" is certainly not the community's
will, as I don't want it (especially since there already is #D).
I don't ask anything to you, so you don't have to post silly replies.
Atsushi Eno
Abe Gillespie wrote:
I can certainly see this degrading into a flame war so I hope it ends
here. I'm part of the Mono community, I don't hold the same view
point, therefore by simple logic it is NOT the opinion of the
community. Besides, isn't it rather arrogant to think your
interpretation of the Wiki text is the correct interpretation?
(that's rhetorical) Unless you're the author in which case it's just
silly to use your opinion to reinforce your opinion.
-Abe
On 4/26/06, Atsushi Eno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Abe Gillespie wrote:
With all do respect, the statement "we don't want the Mono people to
use SWF instead of GTK#" is a personal opinion. One, I think, hardly
reflects the views of the Mono community at large.
Not really. It is kind of the view from the community.
From http://www.mono-project.com/WinForms#Use_of_Native_Widgets :
"The behaviour of a RadioButton has to be exactly like it behaves on
Win32 with MS .Net. Anything else and applications written for may
not work properly anymore. And that's the whole point of
System.Windows.Forms (SWF), to allow running existing .Net SWF apps
with Mono. For all other uses there is Gtk#"
"For all other uses there is Gtk#"
Atsushi Eno
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
