Nikki Locke wrote: > Thats a point against my patch. ... > That's a point against the existing implementation. ... > That's a point against this proposed fix. ... > That sounds horrible. ... > That's a cop-out :-)
Heh, yeah. > What about putting in some type checking when the data is _written_ to the > database, instead? OK, it wouldn't stop exceptions being thrown if the data > was written by a some other app, but at least it would make things work > consistently. I don't think there should be a database that can't be read using any method, even if it wasn't created with Mono.Data.SqliteClient and even if it has crazy nonuniform data in columns. > Could I have a copy of the test code you used to try all this out? I want > to run it on the Microsoft/Finisar version, to see what happens. I was just fooling around with your original test case. For instance, just change '2006-05-11 11:45:00' to 123.456. (Or, change the 'date' type of the column to integer and add some doubles and strings into the table. Things like that.) -- - Joshua Tauberer http://taubz.for.net "Unfortunately, we're having this discussion. It's too bad, because guess who listens to the discussion: the enemy." _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
