Joe Shaw wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 18:30 +0100, Nikki Locke wrote: > > But it is very unusual for a project to recommend deploying the head > > version > > in a mission-critical situation - it is normal to use the version labelled > > "stable". > > What software you deploy into what situations is ultimately your > decision. SWF has never been released in anything but an > unstable/testing capacity, so in many respects, SVN HEAD can be > considered more "stable" than any released version to date.
Oh, right. I wonder if the boss knows that. I'll tell him, anyway. Thanks, everyone, for your patience in answering my sometimes stupid questions. I really appreciate it. -- Nikki Locke, Trumphurst Ltd. PC & Unix consultancy & programming http://www.trumphurst.com/ _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
