Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote: > Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] escribió: >> Robert Jordan escribió: >>> Hey, >>> >>> Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote: >>>> einKI.ml escribió: >>>>>> If you don't want to use ASP.NET and/or System.Windows.Form it's up to >>>>>> you >>>>>> but note that the fact that there is a closed source implementation of >>>>>> them >>>>>> (i.e. Microsoft .NET Framewrok) doesn't mean that you should avoid their >>>>>> open source implementations (i.e. Mono or Portable.NET, IMHO Mono is >>>>>> much >>>>>> better:). >>>>> Im just wondering because they are listed as "controversial elements" in >>>>> the FAQ. But since I am somewhat familiar with ASP.NET I think it make >>>>> sense to use it on Linux too. >>>> There are other frameworks that you can use without ASP.NET AFAIK, that >>>> Miguel has not mentioned (perhaps the ones he has mentioned are too tied >>>> to the AJAX-thing, I mean, they require JavaScript): >>> Miguel mentioned projects that don't use System.Web at all. >>> Dream depends only on some HttpUtility methods (HtmlEncode, etc.), >>> while Jitzu is completely System.Web independent. >>> >>>> - Maverick.NET (if you use non-ASP.NET methods for the view, such as >>>> XSLT+XML+XHTML or NVelocity) >>>> [ http://mavnet.sourceforge.net/ ] >>> It depends on System.Web >>> >>>> - CastleProject (the Ruby on Rails port to C#) >>>> [ http://www.castleproject.org/ ] >>> It depends on System.Web, too. >>> >>>> - Spring.NET (I haven't used this one but seems a port of the Spring >>>> framework from Java to C# that uses AOP) >>>> [ http://www.springframework.net/ ] >>> It depends on System.Web as well. >>> >>>> Using these frameworks you are not only avoiding the use of ASP.NET but >>> You don't. >> Well, IMHO when we were talking about ASP.NET we were not referring to >> the strict API that it surrounds but to the way a programmer designs web >> applications with it (you know, '.aspx' files, <asp:...>-like tags, >> runat=server attributes...).
That's System.Web.UI. It's basically `just' a HttpHandler for the ASP.NET Runtime. > I have re-read the message I firstly replied to and now I think that > perhaps the conversation was actually about the strict API... Read the statement "It depends on System.Web" like "This framework doesn't work outside the ASP.NET Runtime". Robert _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
