Andreas Färber wrote: > Hi, > >> Am 17.10.2006 um 23:52 schrieb Robert Jordan: >> >>> That's rather a cookbook than a self-containing test case ;-) >>> Please provide the complete Xcode project. >>> >>> I tried an own Cocoa app and a Cocoa bundle. Both were working, >>> the latter with the environ 'trick'. So before starting to rename >>> those symbols, I'd like to be convinced that it can't be fixed by >>> removing/adding some smart linker option. >> Attached is a new simplified Xcode project, compiled on PowerPC for >> ppc, which works on ppc but not on i386 when re-compiled on Intel >> for i386. Installation instructions still apply but otherwise "self- >> contained" and hopefully self-explaining!
I didn't receive the project. Maybe it was too large for the list. Please send it as PM. > Your symbols.h patch did appear to rename the functions via #defines, > no? [what did your remark above about starting to rename mean then?] Because the '#define MonoFoo Foo' stuff is just a hack. > It should no longer be a name clash now, or could it still be? If my It can't be, unless one of Mono's sources doesn't include the WAPI/io-layer headers, but then it won't work on Windows. Robert _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
