Atsushi Eno escribió:
>> Do you mean that current SVN is broken in this scenario, or that you
>> don't like the API?
>
> I mean, the behavior (almost equal to the API).
>
> Try to serialize a class which contains members which is ISerializable.
> The serialization is then not contract based anymore.
But, would this affect me if I don't use ISerializable interface in my
classes?? I ask this because my desire would be to have no need to
implement custom serialization for each of my classes. In fact, what I
want to be able to do is to XMLserialize my cyclic objects without
writing more code.
BTW, ISerializable AFAIK is for binary serialization, not XML. Does it
then have any influence in the case we are discussing?
Thanks,
Andrés [ knocte ]
--
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
