Hi Lluis, > On the other hand NApf is more focused on building an application > framework. It has an add-in engine similar to Mono.Addins (since it is > based on the SharpDevelop engine), although it isn't probably as > optimized as Mono.Adidns (it's just a guess, since I haven't analyzed > the code). In addition to add-in engine it offers other modules for > managing settings, logging, and other high level UI components. That's > not covered in Mono.Addins and never will.
NApf's modules are just addins providing you with basic/standard functionality common in many applications. Maybe we should have a chat once, about how different NApf's core (the actual addin engine) is with Mono.AddIns, so we can maybe share ideas/merge or what ever. Is this something you would be interested in? Regards, Matthijs ter Woord _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
