Miguel de Icaza escribió: >> I don't know if the mono team plans to implement that (I thing there's >> no mid-term plan for start hacking on it), but is mostly like having to >> write another toolkit from scratch, am I wrong? > > Some code exists, but we are not focusing on it yet, there are many > other pieces that are required. > >> Maybe that's the reason we're never gonna have it. It would be nice to >> have it, anyway. >> Maybe the implementation of Moonlight could lead to WPF in the end? > > They look very similar, but we believe that we will end up with another > implementation. We will probably learn a lot from Moonlight, and maybe > some of the high-level code can be reused (like the widgets built on top > of the engine). > >> From my humble point of view... it seems like GTK+ is getting too hard >> to update and add new things due to it being written in C or other >> issues. It seems like Qt is much more better designed, and so could be >> WPF, but this can be completely false as I'm not an expert in this topic. > > If you are willing to break compatibility, plenty of things can be done. > But breaking compatibility is not high on the list of the Gtk+ folks > (and I suspect the Qt folks as well).
Thanks for all the info. > But we do agree that you do not know much about what you are talking > about. Was that really needed? When someone says in advance he may be wrong there's no need to say, "hey you really have not f***ing idea!". You really didn't seem that kind of guy. Anyway, thanks for all. Cheers! _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
