On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Manuel de la Pena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, >
Hi, Manuel! > I have been doing some work with IDataParameters and IDbCommands using > the Npsql ADO connector. I've noticed that the Npsql adds a ':' infront > of my parameters name which I have named as '?' + 'parameter_name'. > Yes. Npgsql had a bug which is already fixed where it prefixed parameter name. > I have used the '?' as it is done with the OracleClient, is this the > correct behaviour/approach? > > I have checked the code and Npsql does accept '@' and ':' as the leading > chars of the named parameters. Should '?' also be accepted? I'm sure I > am not the only one that has made this error. > Npgsql only accepts @ and : as prefix for parameter placeholders. There is no work done to support ? as parameter placeholders. Is this a big issue for you? I think we can add support for this type of commandtext. At first Npgsql only supported : prefix. Later we added @ support because it would easy people migrating from SQLServer. Now, if it would easy migration from Oracle, of course we have to do something about it! :) Manuel, can you fill a feature request on our project tracker? http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/?group_id=1000140 Thanks in advance. > > > Cheers for you great work, > And thank you for your interest in Npgsql! -- Regards, Francisco Figueiredo Jr. fxjr.blogspot.com www.npgsql.org _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
