On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Paolo Molaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 03/28/08 Chris Howie wrote: > > Note that it's not that simple though. The signature specifies a > > pthread_t*, not a pthead_t**. It wants a pointer to a structure that > > will be filled in, not a pointer to a pointer (as is IntPtr&). The > > code as writted above will certainly corrupt the memory next to the > > location that the "handler" local is stored in, unless > > sizeof(pthread_t) is <= IntPtr.Size. > > Sure and my code is correct and won't generate any memory corruption > because all the sane operating systems have pthread_t as an integer or a > pointer. You're free to look for an operating system where the above is > incorrect. When you have found it (you might need to write you own, as > even OSX got this bit right...) you will have to port mono to it first.
Ah, I was not aware of this so I was trying to make sure all of the bases were covered. -- Chris Howie http://www.chrishowie.com http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crazycomputers _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
