Just for the record, we shouldn't be deciding the name of a product based on its Googlability. I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader as to why that's a ridiculous metric.
-Abe On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 2:16 AM, Enver ALTIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > imcs reminds me of some instant messaging blah, and I don't like the csi > either for obvious reasons. > > I think following the tradition and adding the `sh` suffix is a really > good idea because the thing by its nature targets unix-savvy people and > not the Visual Studio community. And unix-savvy people know very well > what a shell is good for. > > So yeah, I vote for Juan's second idea: csish. It has 701 hits on > Google, I'm pretty sure a wiki page on go-mono.com will be #1 soon. > > On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 17:39 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote: >> The name of the C# shell today is `csharp', but this is awkward to >> type, we have been considering renaming it, the options are: >> >> * csi - stands for C# interactive >> >> Pros: short, cute, easy to remember. >> Cons: popular TV show. >> >> * imcs - interactive Mono C# compiler >> >> Pros: similar to `gmcs' and `mcs' >> Cons: hard to figure out it exists. > > -- > Enver > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
