Did anything ever happen with this?
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Chad Kittel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Miguel, > > I'm know you're a busy guy, but when you get around to it, and if you > approve the idea, I think we would be ready to start this as soon as > praticible. You've had three positive hits on the idea, that should > be a good starting point to launch it and see how it goes (logistics > and organization of it all). > > You've got currently eager folks ready to help, lets see if we can > make this happen! > > Cheers, > > Chad > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Iggy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'd be happy to get involved and admin some of the documentation. I >> think right now it is by far the most valuable tool for people >> learning Mono and I'd love to add some sample code and documentation >> and admin others contributions... >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Chad Kittel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Miguel, >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Miguel de Icaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I assume someone has to scrutinize the submissions to be sure someone >>>>> isn't tampering with them, and I understand that can take some time. >>>>> But I need to be sure that there actually is someone on the other end >>>>> of that WebService actually acknowledging the submitted changes before >>>>> I commit time and effort into helping out the project in this fashion. >>>> >>>> It is usually me, but I would love if other people wanted to become >>>> "reviewers" to ensure that text is not copy pasted from MSDN. >>> >>> I'd be glad to help in this role, keeping plagiarism out and quality, >>> original documentation in. >>> >>> >>>> The bad news is that many contributions for the documentation have a >>>> high rated of copy-pasting from MSDN, so at some point I started >>>> ignoring most of the contributions to .NET class library documentation, >>>> hoping to one day have some time to do it all in one go. >>> >>> That's kinda what I was afraid of. At this point, unless the >>> reviewing process changes, it sounds like I should not invest my time >>> in writing original documentation for the class libraries as they >>> might very well just sit around collecting dust, instead of being >>> published for the masses to consume. >>> >>> >>>> I am open to giving other people access to the tool to admin things, if >>>> someone wants to step up. >>> >>> I would not at all mind helping out on this front. IMO, the >>> documentation part of the mono project is a very important piece to >>> help mono adoption and retention rates. At this point, MSDN is >>> invaluable and I hope one day MonoDoc is just as invaluable for us >>> mono developers (and maybe even for the developers on the other side >>> of the fence!) >>> >>> >>> -- >>> _ >>> (\o/) Chad 'v3rt1g0' Kittel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> /_\ Beaver Dam, WI (USA) [4 8 15 16 23 42] >>> "This is who we are." // Lunar Linux developer // عزرایل >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mono-list maillist - [email protected] >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mono-list maillist - [email protected] >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list >> > > > > -- > _ > (\o/) Chad 'v3rt1g0' Kittel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > /_\ Beaver Dam, WI (USA) [4 8 15 16 23 42] > "This is who we are." // Lunar Linux developer // عزرایل > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
